The
difference in sodium is only 30 mg. I doubt the palates of most of the
population can differentiate between sodium content at that level when both products are relatively
high.
I
think there is no need for taking strong sides in the Treet vs. Spam comparison, although people have done so. People should be grateful that there
is a low cost meat product out there that serves them well as a Prepper storage
food. The cost is really where the big difference
comes into play. Spam costs 40% more
than Treet, i.e., $2.48 vs. $1.50, and both are relatively the same
as far as nutrition goes, and both are rather salty. However, I see
lots of pictures of people's pantries on YT showing case after case of Ramen Noodles in their food
storages. Now that's a salty product!
It
all boils down to personal preference and an extra $0.98 per can to pay for the
Spam, when they have basically the same value when the an emergency strikes:
To put food in your growling belly!
Treet vs. Spam
Evaluation
Items
for Comparison:
Treet Spam
Cost
$1.50 $2.48
Cost
Difference: 40% less 40% more
Main
Ingredients on Label:
Chicken & Pork Pork with Ham
Ounces
per Container: 12 12
Serving
Size in Ounces: 2 2
Servings
per Container: 6
6
Calories
per Serving:
140 180
Fat
Calories
100 140
Total
Fat in Grams: 11 16
Saturated
Fat in Grams:
3.5 6
Trans
Fat in Grams:
0
0
Cholesterol
in mg:
50 40
Sodium
in mg: 820 790
Total
Carbs in Grams:
4 1
Fiber
in Grams: 0 0
Sugars
in Grams: 2 0
Protein
in Grams: 6 7
Vitamin
A
0% 0%
Vitamin
C
0% 0%
Calcium
6% 0%
Iron 4% 2%
Thanks for stopping by and visiting.
Bob Hotaling